When's the last time somebody actually finished a fight?
Munoz maybe?
Jesus.
Munoz maybe?
Jesus.

And when did the P4P elite quit putting contenders to sleep and turn their sedative savvy against me? After a string of recent disappointments for WEC, Strikeforce, and UFC main events, tough questions have to be asked about the nature of the big one. Why do I hang around until 11:30 and dole out $50 only to see the gods of war putting their Ferraris on cruise control? Why do the fights get worse as the talent gets better? I need answers.
Is it match-making?
Is it pressure to win?
Is it the format, the rules, the styles?
What's the skinny on the recent trend of main events with spectacular talent and insane anticipation that have me switching over to check tennis results by the 3rd round?
Is it match-making?
Is it pressure to win?
Is it the format, the rules, the styles?
What's the skinny on the recent trend of main events with spectacular talent and insane anticipation that have me switching over to check tennis results by the 3rd round?
I fucking hate tennis.
The unfortunate truth is this may be a sign of things to come. Here's why: it's been happening for a long time with some regularity in other combat sports, and MMA is just now catching up.
Take NCAA wrestling for example. Year after year the best athletes from around the country come together to compete in the NCAA Championships. And year after year the tournament is filled with incredible action, inspiring stories, and truly epic matches . . . until the finals. You might say the tournament is akin to the under card of a big event; unknown hopefuls filled with raw aggression, wild risk taking, and an all-or-nothing hunger to finish and score big. The finals, however, are inevitably a more cautious affair; filled with conservative tactics from evenly-matched opponents that often cancel each other out and end in razor-close, indecisive, and sometimes uneventful decisions that can be, in a word, anticlimactic.
These disappointing trends are clearly beginning to emerge among the higher eschelons of MMA. Fighters at the top have infinitely more pressure, more to lose, less to gain by overt aggression, and are typically matched with opponents who are well equipped to counter and capitalize on any false moves. It's a scenario that demands hesitancy -- and that's gay. They've also paid their dues with spilled blood and reckless abandon on many an under card for $2 grand a night, and do not recall fondly the darker days of prelim fodder and bounced checks. The top of the hill is sweet and seductive and what kind of moron is going to come out guns blazing in a sport where one tiny cut, one shot to the temple, one slip on the mat can send you hurdling back into obscurity faster than you can say Iceman. It all adds up to a finale that can fizzle; and of late they've done just that.
The unfortunate truth is this may be a sign of things to come. Here's why: it's been happening for a long time with some regularity in other combat sports, and MMA is just now catching up.
Take NCAA wrestling for example. Year after year the best athletes from around the country come together to compete in the NCAA Championships. And year after year the tournament is filled with incredible action, inspiring stories, and truly epic matches . . . until the finals. You might say the tournament is akin to the under card of a big event; unknown hopefuls filled with raw aggression, wild risk taking, and an all-or-nothing hunger to finish and score big. The finals, however, are inevitably a more cautious affair; filled with conservative tactics from evenly-matched opponents that often cancel each other out and end in razor-close, indecisive, and sometimes uneventful decisions that can be, in a word, anticlimactic.
These disappointing trends are clearly beginning to emerge among the higher eschelons of MMA. Fighters at the top have infinitely more pressure, more to lose, less to gain by overt aggression, and are typically matched with opponents who are well equipped to counter and capitalize on any false moves. It's a scenario that demands hesitancy -- and that's gay. They've also paid their dues with spilled blood and reckless abandon on many an under card for $2 grand a night, and do not recall fondly the darker days of prelim fodder and bounced checks. The top of the hill is sweet and seductive and what kind of moron is going to come out guns blazing in a sport where one tiny cut, one shot to the temple, one slip on the mat can send you hurdling back into obscurity faster than you can say Iceman. It all adds up to a finale that can fizzle; and of late they've done just that.

It's easy, too, to sit back and judge from the safe and anonymous surroundings of fandom, but human behavior doesn't lie. And when the social and economic pressures push athletes toward winning rather than fighting, the result is unmistakable: we get Anderson and Aldo refusing to put lame horses out of their misery; we get Penn and Edgar point fighting for half-an-hour; we get Shields and Lawal dry humping their way into our hearts; we get GSP and Melendez playing the equivalent of combat bumper bowling. And who, besides we drunken buffoons with no frame of reference or comparable experience, can blame them?
So, now what?
Yellow cards, bigger incentives to finish (KOTN bonuses), stalling calls and point deductions, revised scoring systems that reward effort to finish over mat control or isolated take downs, sudden death overtime ala K-1? How do you create a sense of urgency for millionaire professional athletes who have to deal with constant and unpredictable risks that vastly outweigh the rewards? Can anything be done?
While the answer may not be clear, the answer is clearly yes, and I leave it to the sport to show us the way forward as it has so many times before when we spectators and participators could not have dreamt where it would lead us. And after all, isn't that the beauty of MMA: seeing the evolution of martial arts in real-time? Seeing new techniques, strategies, styles, and prototypes succeed and fail in the most Darwinesque of dances, yielding the most definitive proofs of what may come. To this effect, MMA has changed more in a decade than NCAA wrestling has in a century, and it will adapt and thrive where wrestling has come to a stalemate -- we need only sit back and let it, and not pretend we have the knowledge or authority to guide it.
That is earned.


